<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Lifestream Blog - Latest Comments in My Thoughts on Posterous as a Lifestreaming Platform</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.disqus.com/</link><description>Social data aggregation, lifelogging, quantified self and digital preservation.</description><atom:link href="https://lifestreamblog.disqus.com/my_thoughts_on_posterous_as_a_lifestreaming_platform/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:39:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: My Thoughts on Posterous as a Lifestreaming Platform</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.com/my-thoughts-on-posterous-as-a-lifestreaming-platform/#comment-26222127</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mark,&lt;br&gt;Brilliant post.  I came across this searching for a way to import an RSS feed into Posterous.  I'm new to the terminology, but your concepts hit the nail on the head.  I now understand that I've been trying to use Posterous as both a lifestreaming aggregator and a broadcaster!  Like you said, it's really only designed to broadcast, but I've been trying to get more out of it -- and it's really a pain!  You said that there are many other options for lifestreaming.  Which services are the best to use in your opinion?  What can best capture all my activities across the web automatically, and at the same time be a service to keep me connected across my several social networks by cross-updating?&lt;br&gt;Thank you for your thoughts and clearly explaining the problem I didn't know I had!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">breedm</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:39:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Thoughts on Posterous as a Lifestreaming Platform</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.com/my-thoughts-on-posterous-as-a-lifestreaming-platform/#comment-25597799</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just tracked down this post, which is highly lucid as well as practical.  I'm currently using Posterous as a running gloss or set of marginalia on my 'macro' blog on TypePad.  I appreciate your input and will track you blog going forward.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Makurrah</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:30:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Thoughts on Posterous as a Lifestreaming Platform</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.com/my-thoughts-on-posterous-as-a-lifestreaming-platform/#comment-24660623</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I need the import funcationality. Flickr is a big part of what I do. Posterous doesn't allow me the control I need when posting there. With tools like Lightroom 3 integrating so closely with Flickr that's what I'll be using to post there. As cool as posterous is, if I can't import those photos into it, it's mostly worthless to me. I can't figure out how I'd use it. Maybe they can just pick select services. No rss feeds. And if they import something like Twitter, filter out @ replies and retweets.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'd really live it if they could import my Twitter then push the photo back out to a couple other blogs including posterous of course. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charles</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:23:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Thoughts on Posterous as a Lifestreaming Platform</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.com/my-thoughts-on-posterous-as-a-lifestreaming-platform/#comment-22419823</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ileane, thank you for the kind words and sharing the story.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Krynsky</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:26:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Thoughts on Posterous as a Lifestreaming Platform</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.com/my-thoughts-on-posterous-as-a-lifestreaming-platform/#comment-21463140</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mark, There are so many aspects of this new Web 2.0 that I don't think there is enough hours in the day to keep up with them all. You have done an excellent job of helping me understand Postereous and the concept of lifestreaming. And it is an added bonus for me that you mentioned aspects of Tumblr as well.&lt;br&gt;I have a Postereous blog but I am not really sure if I need it, since my primary blog is with &lt;a href="http://WordPress.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="WordPress.com"&gt;WordPress.com&lt;/a&gt;. I went to Diigo (a bookmarking service that I absolutely love using to build my Personal Learning Network - PLN) to search for Postereous and found nothing. So I added this article (which I found on Google) and now it is being shared with the rest of the Diigo community.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thank you for this very insightful post.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ileane</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 06:26:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Thoughts on Posterous as a Lifestreaming Platform</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.com/my-thoughts-on-posterous-as-a-lifestreaming-platform/#comment-15721825</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Simply encourage people to upvote comments and include some collaborative filtering first. From there, you can scale up to learning algos, or use it as a base for semantic fine-tuning.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bertilhatt</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 13:13:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Thoughts on Posterous as a Lifestreaming Platform</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.com/my-thoughts-on-posterous-as-a-lifestreaming-platform/#comment-15693549</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting. Thanks for letting me know!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mahendra</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:58:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Thoughts on Posterous as a Lifestreaming Platform</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.com/my-thoughts-on-posterous-as-a-lifestreaming-platform/#comment-15693451</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ah -good stuff. Glad to see they're working on it. Another thing, which I'll post to that thread, too.. is that some of my facebook folks have wondered wy sharein links do not launch a new browser tab. minor point IMO, but relevant to some.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">phildunn</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:55:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Thoughts on Posterous as a Lifestreaming Platform</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.com/my-thoughts-on-posterous-as-a-lifestreaming-platform/#comment-15689364</link><description>&lt;p&gt;None that I know of, yet. I found this: &lt;a href="http://help.sharein.com/discussions/feedback/30-twitter-fb-share-simultaneously" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://help.sharein.com/discussions/feedback/30-twitter-fb-share-simultaneously"&gt;http://help.sharein.com/dis...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mahendra</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:04:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Thoughts on Posterous as a Lifestreaming Platform</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.com/my-thoughts-on-posterous-as-a-lifestreaming-platform/#comment-15595277</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One drawback that I can see immediately is that you have to duplicate your efforts to post to both Twitter and Facebook. Is there a way to post to both in the settings? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">phildunn</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 12:21:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Thoughts on Posterous as a Lifestreaming Platform</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.com/my-thoughts-on-posterous-as-a-lifestreaming-platform/#comment-15592945</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice - I will give this a whirl. Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">phildunn</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 10:21:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Thoughts on Posterous as a Lifestreaming Platform</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.com/my-thoughts-on-posterous-as-a-lifestreaming-platform/#comment-15580594</link><description>&lt;p&gt;phildunn,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For content sharing, you might want to check out &lt;a href="http://sharein.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://sharein.com"&gt;http://sharein.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mahendra</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 20:04:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Thoughts on Posterous as a Lifestreaming Platform</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.com/my-thoughts-on-posterous-as-a-lifestreaming-platform/#comment-15579995</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"don't like the way it inserts itself in the middle of everything" (falzone). This is my major beef with Posterous. My process seeks to share content and conversations seamlessly. Posterous takes links I share from the bookmarklet then hyperlinks them to my Posterous feed instead of the original article. That blows, IMHO. It's a little scammy. Strange how it grabs the image, too. It makes my Facebook people jump through too many hoops to see the content, for example. I realize that a direct link would cut Posterous out of the eyeballs loop, but it doesn't suit my needs for a lot of different content sharing activities.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">phildunn</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 19:34:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Thoughts on Posterous as a Lifestreaming Platform</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.com/my-thoughts-on-posterous-as-a-lifestreaming-platform/#comment-15579240</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Glue has a very similar service as well and is currently in Beta. We're releasing some pro services in early 2010. This includes the ability to share images, audio, video and text content across all your sites and networks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Glue publishes to: Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, Virb, Posterous, LiveJournal, Blogger, PureVolume, Wordpress, iLike, Tumblr, RSS, Flash Widget and Custom Javascript &amp;amp; PHP feeds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We're adding new features weekly based on user feedback. So if there's something you're looking for let us know and we'll see if we can't help you out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Jordan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://Glue.gs" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://Glue.gs"&gt;http://Glue.gs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">getGlue</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 18:48:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Thoughts on Posterous as a Lifestreaming Platform</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.com/my-thoughts-on-posterous-as-a-lifestreaming-platform/#comment-15559778</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're welcome, but I'm sure some will still have questions as it can still be a little difficult to grasp.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Krynsky</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 02:57:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Thoughts on Posterous as a Lifestreaming Platform</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.com/my-thoughts-on-posterous-as-a-lifestreaming-platform/#comment-15559765</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not sure what you mean by end result but the first method allows importing from a limitless number of 3rd party services that offer an RSS feed while the second requires you to post everything yourself using 3 defined methods. Hope that helps.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Krynsky</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 02:56:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Thoughts on Posterous as a Lifestreaming Platform</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.com/my-thoughts-on-posterous-as-a-lifestreaming-platform/#comment-15531265</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great visual to clarify Posterous v Lifestream. Didn't really need another, but I did it: &lt;a href="http://ericmatas.posterous.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://ericmatas.posterous.com"&gt;http://ericmatas.posterous.com&lt;/a&gt; is live. Oy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Matas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:04:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Thoughts on Posterous as a Lifestreaming Platform</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.com/my-thoughts-on-posterous-as-a-lifestreaming-platform/#comment-15505492</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for clearing the confusion folks might have had with 'Posterous for Lifestreaming'.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mahendra</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 21:02:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Thoughts on Posterous as a Lifestreaming Platform</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.com/my-thoughts-on-posterous-as-a-lifestreaming-platform/#comment-15486675</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The end result is the same. What am I missing?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kingsley Joseph</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:11:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Thoughts on Posterous as a Lifestreaming Platform</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.com/my-thoughts-on-posterous-as-a-lifestreaming-platform/#comment-15474382</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you. There is some great content being created on Posterous. I've been enjoying it over there as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Krynsky</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:41:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Thoughts on Posterous as a Lifestreaming Platform</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.com/my-thoughts-on-posterous-as-a-lifestreaming-platform/#comment-15474338</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Chuck and glad you liked it. My goal was both to explain to people who understood the original Lifestreaming model of aggregating services to those considering and confused by the role Posterous played, as well as educating people that hadn't heard of Lifestreaming to understand the differences.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Krynsky</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:40:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Thoughts on Posterous as a Lifestreaming Platform</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.com/my-thoughts-on-posterous-as-a-lifestreaming-platform/#comment-15474188</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your thoughts on the ability to filter on a per service basis bring up issues I've heard others discuss as well. Usually as it pertains to taming the firehose. I think the next phase of Lifestreaming will be the creation of intelligent algorithms that analyze the massive amount of data we are creating and add some features around it. I already could see that an intelligent recommendation engine for products and services could be built around my social graph...and even be geo specific. But one to automatically filter noise based on content determination will be a bit trickier.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Krynsky</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:37:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Thoughts on Posterous as a Lifestreaming Platform</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.com/my-thoughts-on-posterous-as-a-lifestreaming-platform/#comment-15473887</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was hoping the visual would bring clarity. Glad you liked it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Krynsky</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:31:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Thoughts on Posterous as a Lifestreaming Platform</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.com/my-thoughts-on-posterous-as-a-lifestreaming-platform/#comment-15473792</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the insight Micah. It's always interesting to hear the way others determine what content to flow to various channels and services.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Krynsky</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:29:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Thoughts on Posterous as a Lifestreaming Platform</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.com/my-thoughts-on-posterous-as-a-lifestreaming-platform/#comment-15467756</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This piece totally nails the trouble I've had in grokking Posterous. I kept hearing "it's great for lifestreaming!" and just couldn't find anything there that looked like lifestreaming to me...because I had the first model in mind.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I appreciate Posterous' features, but don't like the way it inserts itself in the middle of everything. I'm just more comfortable with the first model.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chuck Falzone</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:15:53 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>